
Industry Vendor Rankings · September 30, 2026 · GrowthPros
What is Angi's annual revenue?
Angi's annual revenue is $1.03 billion for FY2025, down 13% year-over-year. See the 3-year decline, lead volume drops, and what it means for lead buyers.

Key Facts
- Angi's FY2025 revenue hit $1.03 billion, down 13% year-over-year, according to revenue data.
- Angi has lost roughly $730 million — about 41% — of annual revenue since its $1.76 billion peak in 2022, per revenue history.
- Angi's trailing twelve-month revenue slipped below the billion-dollar mark to $992.55 million as of Q2 2026, the same tracker shows.
- Angi's U.S. leads fell 13% year-over-year in Q2 2026, per its 8-K filing.
- Angi's average monthly active Pros dropped 17% to 106,000 in Q2 2026, even as acquired Pros rose 13%, SEC disclosures reveal.
- Angi's sales and marketing spend runs 35–45% of revenue versus an industry average of 25–30%, one analysis notes.
- Angi's service professionals are available on five other platforms simultaneously, making the marketplace largely interchangeable, a business analysis observes.
The Answer: Angi's Revenue Is $1.03 Billion and Shrinking
Angi Inc. still clears the billion-dollar mark — but just barely, and the direction of travel matters more than the headline number. For businesses evaluating lead vendors, that trajectory tells you a lot about what it's like to buy leads from the marketplace today.
Angi's most recent full-year revenue came in at $1.03 billion for fiscal 2025, down 13.04% year-over-year, according to StockAnalysis revenue data. A second source, a business analysis of Angi's model, corroborates the figure at roughly $1.03 billion, down 13% — so the number is solid.
The bigger story is the three-year slide. Angi peaked at $1.76 billion in 2022 and has declined every year since: $1.36 billion in 2023, $1.19 billion in 2024, and $1.03 billion in 2025, per the revenue history data. That's roughly $730 million in annual revenue lost — about 41% — since the peak.
The decline hasn't stopped at the fiscal year boundary, either. Trailing twelve-month revenue as of Q2 2026 stands at $992.55 million, down 8.83%, meaning Angi has now slipped below the billion-dollar run rate entirely, according to the same revenue tracker.
The operational numbers behind that contraction are worth noting for anyone benchmarking lead vendors:
- U.S. leads declined 13% year-over-year in Q2 2026, per Angi's 8-K filing summary.
- Average monthly active Pros fell 17% to 106,000, even as acquired Pros rose 13% — a sign of engagement and retention problems.
- Q2 2026 revenue of $248.0M was down 11% from $278.2M a year earlier.
The takeaway for vendor selection is straightforward. Angi is still enormous by lead-industry standards — its trailing revenue dwarfs peers like ZipRecruiter at $452.26 million and Fiverr at $418.35 million, per peer comparisons. But scale alone doesn't tell you whether the leads you buy will be exclusive, qualified, or followed up quickly. A shrinking marketplace with falling lead volume and departing Pros is a very different buying environment than a growing one.
That's the lens we'd apply at GrowthPros when comparing vendors: revenue scale tells you a company's size, but lead exclusivity, consent records, and speed-to-lead tell you whether that size works for you. Angi's Pros are, as one analysis notes, "available on five other platforms simultaneously" — a structural reality of shared marketplaces that no revenue figure offsets.
Why a Billion-Dollar Marketplace Is Losing Leads and Pros
A billion dollars in annual revenue sounds like a fortress — until you notice the walls are thinning. Angi's most recent full-year revenue of roughly $1.03 billion masks a structural problem that matters far more to lead buyers than the headline number: the marketplace model itself is leaking.
The operational data tells the story. In Q2 2026, Angi's total U.S. leads fell 13% year-over-year, and average monthly active Pros dropped 17% to just 106,000, according to the company's SEC filing disclosures. Notably, acquired Pros actually rose 13% to 27,000 — meaning Angi is still signing new professionals but failing to keep them engaged.
The root cause sits in the shared-marketplace structure. As one business analysis observes, Angi's service professionals "are available on five other platforms simultaneously," which makes Angi one of several interchangeable lead sources rather than an essential one. Homeowners, meanwhile, transact only 2–4 times per year, so neither side of the marketplace develops real stickiness.
That weak retention shows up in the cost structure:
- Sales and marketing spend runs 35–45% of revenue, versus an industry average of roughly 25–30% — a sign of expensive, churn-driven acquisition.
- Revenue has declined three consecutive years, from a $1.76 billion peak in 2022 to $1.03 billion — a loss of about 41%.
- Trailing twelve-month revenue as of Q2 2026 has slipped below the billion-dollar mark to $992.55 million.
For a contractor evaluating lead vendors, the implication is direct: when your lead source is interchangeable, so are the leads it sells you. Shared leads distributed to five competing buyers reward speed and luck, not qualification. The vendor's churn becomes your cost-per-closed-job problem.
This is why exclusivity has become the benchmark that matters. GrowthPros sells leads as a product — exclusive, or capped-shared to a hard maximum of two buyers — precisely because the shared-marketplace economics that erode Angi's retention also erode close rates for the pros buying from it.
The takeaway for benchmarking vendors isn't that a billion-dollar marketplace is bad. It's that scale and stability are not the same thing. A vendor losing leads and Pros simultaneously, while spending 35–45% of revenue to replace them, is telling you something about what your leads will be worth.
What Angi's Numbers Mean for Lead Buyers: Scale vs. Exclusivity
A billion dollars in revenue sounds impressive — until you realize it buys you a lead that four other contractors also just bought. Angi's FY2025 revenue of roughly $1.03 billion, down 13% year-over-year, still makes it one of the largest lead marketplaces in home services. But scale and lead quality are two very different questions, and the numbers suggest buyers should look past the headline figure.
Here's the structural issue: Angi's shared model means a single lead can go to up to five competing buyers, and one analysis notes its service professionals are "available on five other platforms simultaneously." You're not just bidding against local competitors — you're bidding against the marketplace's own economics. Homeowners only transact 2–4 times per year, so every shared lead becomes a five-way race to the phone.
Compare that with the alternative models gaining ground. Exclusive leads — sold to one buyer — typically close 15–30% higher than shared leads, which is why they command 2–4x the price. Capped-shared models, like GrowthPros's, hard-cap distribution at two buyers instead of five. The math is simple: fewer competitors per lead means higher close rates and lower effective cost per acquisition, even at a higher sticker price.
Angi's own numbers back this shift toward quality over volume. In Q1 2026, the company deliberately shrank Network Revenue 56% to $17.1M while growing Proprietary Revenue 7% to $185.4M — trading low-quality volume for higher-intent, company-controlled transactions. Meanwhile, U.S. leads fell 13% year-over-year and active Pros dropped 17% to 106,000 in Q2 2026.
What this means when you're evaluating lead vendors:
- Revenue scale measures marketplace reach, not lead exclusivity — a $1B vendor can still sell you a five-way shared lead.
- Ask how many buyers receive each lead. If the answer is "up to five," your close rate is structurally capped before you even pick up the phone.
- Watch the vendor's own trajectory: three consecutive years of revenue decline (roughly $730M lost since the 2022 peak, per revenue data) signals churn, not momentum.
- Check what's included after delivery — Angi only beta-launched AI lead follow-up in July 2026, while some vendors have made five-minute speed-to-lead standard.
The industry's largest player is quietly restructuring around the thesis that fewer, better, higher-intent leads beat more shared ones. Lead buyers would do well to apply the same test to their own vendor lineup.
Speed-to-Lead: The Gap Angi Is Only Now Trying to Close
Angi’s slow move into automated lead follow-up reveals a growing gap in responsiveness that buyers now expect. While GrowthPros has built its model around five-minute AI voice, SMS, and email follow-up as a standard inclusion, Angi only beta-launched its "AI Front Desk" tool for automated lead follow-up in July 2026. This delay matters because contacting a lead within five minutes makes engagement roughly 100 times more likely than waiting thirty minutes, and 78% of buyers choose the vendor that responds first. In a market where speed often outweighs size, Angi’s shared-lead model — which allows professionals to appear on five other platforms simultaneously — struggles to retain homeowner attention when faster, more exclusive alternatives exist.
GrowthPros positions its lead product around this exact reality: every lead, whether freshly sourced or reactivated from a dormant list, receives immediate multi-channel AI follow-up without upsell or delay. Unlike Angi’s declining lead volume — down 13% year-over-year in Q2 2026 — GrowthPros focuses on exclusivity and response speed as core differentiators. Its capped-shared leads go to no more than two buyers, reducing competition and increasing intent clarity, while its AI follow-up system operates 24/7 to ensure no lead waits beyond the critical five-minute window.
This approach contrasts sharply with Angi’s current trajectory, where sales and marketing spend runs 35–45% of revenue — well above the industry average of 25–30% — suggesting costly acquisition in a marketplace with low stickiness. Homeowners typically transact only 2–4 times per year, making first-response advantage even more critical. By embedding speed into the lead delivery process rather than treating it as an add-on, GrowthPros aligns with buyer behavior: respond fast, respond first, win the job.
For contractors evaluating lead sources, the choice isn’t just about scale — it’s about who gets to the conversation first. Angi’s $1.03 billion FY2025 revenue reflects a once-dominant platform now navigating decline, while newer models prioritize velocity and exclusivity as non-negotiables. In a digital home services market growing at 8–12% CAGR, the vendors that close the speed-to-lead gap won’t just compete — they’ll set the standard.
Get qualified, consent-recorded leads followed up in minutes — including the leads you already paid for.
Book your free 15-minute qualification call to see how exclusive leads with built-in AI follow-up can change your close rate.
Submit the get-started funnel and receive your first batch of niche-specific leads with consent trails attached — no guesswork, no delays.
How to Benchmark Your Next Lead Vendor (Checklist)
Most lead vendors won't tell you how many buyers share a single contact, whether consent records travel with the data, or how fast the first follow-up actually fires. Angi's marketplace model sends the same lead to multiple pros — its own filings show professionals are "available on five other platforms simultaneously" — while its U.S. lead volume fell 13% year-over-year in Q2 2026 and active pros dropped 17% to 106,000.
- How many buyers receive each lead — and is there a hard cap?
- Does every lead arrive with a consent record (disclosure text, timestamp, IP, named contacting party)?
- Are lists DNC-scrubbed before any outbound touch, with opt-outs honored across SMS, voice, and email?
- What is the guaranteed follow-up window — and is AI voice, SMS, and email included or an upsell?
- Where do leads land — native CRM integration, webhook, or a shared inbox you have to monitor?
GrowthPros delivers exclusive leads by niche and capped-shared leads at a maximum of two buyers, each qualified, time-stamped, and consent-recorded before it reaches your CRM. Every lead — fresh or reactivated — gets AI voice, SMS, and email follow-up inside five minutes, 24/7, because contacting a lead within five minutes makes contact roughly 100x more likely than at thirty minutes. No self-serve checkout, no invented pricing — a free 15-minute qualification call sets real numbers for your niche and volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Angi's annual revenue?
Angi's most recent full-year revenue was $1.03 billion for fiscal 2025, down 13.04% year-over-year, a figure corroborated by two independent sources. That headline number is shrinking, though — trailing twelve-month revenue as of Q2 2026 has already slipped below the billion-dollar mark to $992.55 million, per StockAnalysis revenue data.
Is Angi's revenue growing or declining?
Declining — and consistently. Angi peaked at $1.76 billion in 2022 and has fallen every year since: $1.36 billion in 2023, $1.19 billion in 2024, and $1.03 billion in 2025, a loss of roughly $730 million or about 41% of annual revenue, per revenue history data.
How does Angi's revenue compare to other lead generation companies?
Angi is still far larger than most peers — its trailing revenue dwarfs ZipRecruiter at $452.26 million and Fiverr at $418.35 million, per peer comparisons. But scale alone doesn't tell you whether the leads you buy will be exclusive, qualified, or followed up quickly — a shrinking marketplace is a very different buying environment than a growing one.
Why is Angi losing revenue if it's still a billion-dollar company?
The core problem is retention on both sides of the marketplace. In Q2 2026, U.S. leads fell 13% year-over-year and average monthly active Pros dropped 17% to 106,000 — even as acquired Pros rose 13% — meaning Angi signs new professionals but fails to keep them engaged, per Angi's 8-K filing summary.
Does Angi's declining revenue affect the quality of leads I'd buy?
It can. Angi's shared model means its professionals are 'available on five other platforms simultaneously,' so a single lead can go to up to five competing buyers — structurally capping your close rate before you even pick up the phone, per one business analysis. Exclusive leads typically close 15–30% higher than shared ones, which is why GrowthPros caps distribution at a hard maximum of two buyers.
Is Angi doing anything to turn things around?
Yes — it's pivoting toward an AI-native, higher-intent model. In Q1 2026 Angi deliberately shrank low-quality Network Revenue 56% to $17.1M while growing Proprietary Revenue 7% to $185.4M, per the company's Q1 2026 filing summary, and it beta-launched its 'AI Front Desk' follow-up tool in July 2026 — validating the industry shift toward fewer, better, faster-followed leads that GrowthPros has made standard.
The Billion-Dollar Lesson: Size Isn't a Lead Strategy
Angi's $1.03 billion in annual revenue still makes it a giant in lead generation — but the trajectory tells the real story. Three consecutive years of decline, roughly $730 million lost since the 2022 peak, and a trailing-twelve-month figure that's slipped below the billion-dollar mark (per revenue data) point to a marketplace losing leads and Pros at the same time. For anyone buying leads, the takeaway is simple: scale measures reach, not quality. A vendor whose leads go to five competing buyers, whose follow-up only arrived in beta form in 2026, and whose sales spend runs well above industry norms is telling you what your cost-per-closed-job will look like. Benchmark every vendor on exclusivity, consent records, and speed-to-lead — the factors that actually move close rates. If you want to see what exclusive, consent-recorded leads with five-minute AI follow-up look like for your niche, book a free 15-minute qualification call with GrowthPros — honest about fit, committed to nothing.
This article is general information, not legal or financial advice. Benchmark figures are directional industry data, not guarantees of results.